The high court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's apparent lack of interest and failure to file proof of service of personal notice on respondents.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3494]
APHC010269902008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, T H E TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO T H OUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.21506 of 2008
Between:
Somarouthu Ananda Na g a Raju, S/o.Rayudayya, Aganampudi Village, Gajuwaka Mandal, GVMC, Visakhapatnam.
… P etitioner
AND Indala Ramu, S/o.Appal a Naidu, Rajeev Nagar, Uppara Colony side, Ne a r Hill Area, Old Aganampudi, GVMC, Visakhapatnam D istrict, and others.
… Res p ondents
Counsel for the petitione r : Koka Satyanarayana Rao Counsel for respondents 1 to 20 : ----Counsel for respondet N o .21 : Government Pleader for R e venue
ORDER : ( per NJS,J )
Though the writ p e tition is listed under the caption “For D i smissal”, there is no representa t ion on behalf of the petitioner. As per the endorsement of the R e gistry, proof of service of personal n otice on respondent Nos.1 to 20 w as not filed. It appears that the petitio n er is not interested in pursuing th e writ petition.
2
NINALA JAYASURYA,J
SUMATHI JAGADAM,J
October 23, 2024. vasu
Somarouthu Ananda Na g a Raju
Indala Ramu
NINALA JAYASURYA
SUMATHI JAGADAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
