First appeal against judgment and decree in O.S.No.180 of 2013. Appellant filed a memo to withdraw the appeal as the matter was compromised between the parties; respondents did not object.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
THURSDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
FIRST APPEAL NO: 1422 OF 2018
Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C, aggrieved bytheJudgmentand decree dated 10-04-2018 in O.S.No.180 of 2013 on thefileoftheVIAdditional District Judge Markapur, Prakasam District.
BETWEEN:-
Battagiri Venkata Subba Reddy, S/o. Pedda Gali Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Darimadugu Village, MarkapurMandal,now residing at Guntur.
...APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF
AND
...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI. P. SRIDHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. S.A.V. SAI KUMAR
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
%
APHC010600192018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3369]
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
APPEAL SUIT No: 1422/2018
Between;
Battagiri Venkata Subba Reddy
...APPELLANT
AND
Chevula Avulaiah and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.P SRIDHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent{S);
1.S AVSAI KUMAR
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT:
The Appeal Suit is preferred by the appellant againsttheJudgmentand Decree dated 10.04.2018, passed in O.S.No.180 of 2013,onthefileofthe learned VI Additional District Judge, Markapur.
compromised between the parties.
/
/
/
- In view of the above and without going into the correctness of the submissions, the appeal suit is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in this appeal shall stand
closed.
SD/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR
<br>To,
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
Ssl
vna
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/12/2024
JUDGMENT
AS.N0.1422 0F 2018
II
o 0 9 JAN 2025 |
'v5>
. Current Section ^
DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS WITHDRAWN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Battagiri Venkata Subba Reddy
Chevula Avulaiah
Chevula Bala Guravaiah
Chevula Bala Raju
A.P. State, Rep. by the District Collector, Prakasam District, Ongole
The Tahasildar, Markapur Mandal
T Mallikarjuna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
