First appeal against a decree in a civil suit; appellants did not appear despite notices and listing for dismissal. The High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution with no order as to costs and closed pending miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
'W”
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT|;^''^5|
THURSDAY .THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR.V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR
FIRST APPEAL NO: 1102 OF 2012
(Appeal Under Section 96 of C.P.C against the JudgmentandDecreedated3-10- 2012 in OS NO. 242 of 2011, on the file of the Court of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada.)
Between:
...Appellants
AND
Pepakayala Suryanarayana, S/o. P.Veeraju, Occ; Retd. Employee of Food Corporation of India, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District.
...Respondent/Defendant
Counsel for the Appellants: SRI. N SRIRAMS MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondents:
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE DR.V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR
A.S.No.1102 of 2012
JUDGMENT:
- Despite notices sent by the Registry to the appellants and despite listing the matter under the caption Tor dismissal’, there is no representation for the appellants.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,
shall stand closed.
Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO DEPUTRY REGISTRY
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
vna
HIGH COURT
DATED:11/01/2024
JUGMENT
AS.No.1102 of 2012
6 copfes
ol I3 2J+
D4L.
DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR NON-PROSECUTION
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pepakayala Janaki Siromani Manikyamba Satya Devi
Pepakayala Lavanya
Pepakayala Suryanarayana
V.R.K.Krupa Sagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
