Hafiz Basheer Ahmed v. Abdul Gaffar and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal under Section 100 CPC dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant was repeatedly unrepresented; no order as to costs and miscellaneous petitions closed.
Second appeal under Section 100 CPC dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant was repeatedly unrepresented; no order as to costs and miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR SECOND APPEAL NO: 398 OF 2001
Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC against the order dated against the decree and Judgment dated 16.08.2000 passed in AS No.36 of 1997 on the file Additional District Judge, Kurnool, confirming the orders passed in OS No. 92 of 1990 dated 28.03.1997 on the file of the Court of the Additional Sub Judge, Kurnool. Between:
Hafiz Basheer Ahmed, S/o. Gulam Hussain R/o. Ring Reddy Beedi Factory, Masoom Basha Dargah Road, Kurnool. ...APPELLANT AND 1. Abdul Gaffar S/o. late Ibrahim Saheb, Darvesh Khadri Public Welfare Association, Kurnool 2. Iqbal Ahmed, S/o. Haji Gulam Hussain R/o. Ring Reddy Beedi Factory Budhawarpet, Kurnool. ...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellants : SRI. B NARASIMHA SARMA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. K SOMA KONDA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI.SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
1
THE HON’BLB SRI JUSTICE DR.V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR
SECOND APPEAL No.398 of 2001
JUDGMENT ;
- Learned counsel for respondents alone is present. No representation for appellant.
- On 13.12.2023, 03.01.2024 and 09.01.2024 also, there was no representation for appellant. Today the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal.Thereis no representation for appellant.
prosecution. No order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any, stand
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- E. KAMESWARA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
To,
SECTIONtDFFICER
. .WH COURT
• : DATED:12/01/2024
JUDGMENT
SA.No.398 of 2001 Copfes 2ol3lz4DSL
AN07?^
Ue)X 2T MAy 202^ Asm
DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hafiz Basheer Ahmed
Abdul Gaffar
Iqbal Ahmed
V R K Krupa Sagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court