The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a second appeal for non-prosecution due to the consistent absence of the appellant's counsel across all four posted dates.
The Second Appeal No. 1325 of 2003 is dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR
SECOND APPEAL NO: 1325 OF 2003
Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC against the order dated against the decree and Judgment dated 14.10.2003 passed in AS No.107of1990onthefile court of the I Additional District Judge, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, confirming the Decree and Judgment, dated 22.02.1990 passed inOSNo.190of1989 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge Gudivada,KrishnaDistrict
Between:
The Appellants No’s 2 to 4 are brought on record as Legal Representatives of the deceased Appellant vide c.o. dt. 19/4/07 in SAMP 807 of 2007 in SA No. 1325/2003.
...APPELLANT AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellants : SRI BRAHMADANDI RAMESH Counsel for the Respondents N0.I: SRI MRS SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents N0.I to 3 C.B. RAMMOHAN REDDY The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE DR.V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR
S.A.No.1325 of 2003
JUDGMENT:
- Sri Ajay, learned counsel representing on behalf ofSri M.R.S.Srinivas, learned counsel for the respondentsalone is present, Sri T.C.D.Sekhar, learned counsel for some of the respondents is also present.
- No representation for the appellant. In the last four occasions there has been no representation for the appellant.
- Today, the matter is posted under the caption Tor for the dismissal’. Yet, there is no representation appellant.
- In the result, S.A.No.l325 of 2003 is ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
SD/- E. KAMESWARA RAO DEPUTY R ISTRAR
I
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. The I Additional District Judge, Machilipatnam, Krishna District 2. The Senior Civil Judge Gudivada, Krishna District. 3. One CC to Sri Brahmadandi Ramesh Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri C.B. Rammohan Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri M R S Srinivas Advocate [OPUC] 6. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 7. Three CD Copies psr PRK
HIGH COURT
DATED:09/01/2024
JUDGMENT
SA.No.1325 of 2003
q Copfes
20I3 b-Lf
DSL_
DISMISSING SECOND APPEAL FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Ch. Chandramouli
Ch. Abhayamba
Ch. Saibala
Chendhala Sulochana
Daruga Nageswara Rao
DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
