Writ petition filed by students challenging inaction in extending time for college construction was disposed of as the specific cause survived for adjudication did not exist, rendering the writ infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
A
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADD^?
WRIT PETITION NO: 4621 OF 2021
Between:
2.
U
<W«l05.<d;<98i)P.w3rGi5^
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is tiled praying that in the D ’®®‘ ’® affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleas^ to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly X in Mrticuteriv°in^not°tok^®"‘’®"'"’ declaring the action of the Respondents, more particularly, in not taking any active steps in securing extension of time for 0“ Ste of D?VRAm^h "rtV''Tii'';h "* Government for construction mnLn an? ?/ ^r B.RAmbodkar till the completion of the academic year or in making any alternative arrangements in pursuance of the eviction notice^ issued in Letter No. CB/Studt/MC/122, dated 02.02.2021 issued by the 3rd[^Resoondent td ther?bO 16.02.2021 issued by the 4th Respondent and thereby prejudicing the interests of the Petitioners and other Students as beino 19 a?d 2^ Jf ihA Con" n J®"'®'! I?7.“P'®= 'P". Pod in violation of Articles 14, not tn tail Constitution of Indiaand consequently direct the Respondents not to take active steps in shifting of the 6 respondent college till completion of ake^nSXrr P^^ft^ners and also direct the 6th respondent college to take necessary steps for extension of time
lA NO: 1 OF 2021 •
o? =i'c‘-'"stanoes stated in ?SSS»«aasBs Rpfnn'nd^^ LlNo^AB/NTPA/S/MC 168M dated 16.02.2021 issued by the 4th Respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
5
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No. 6: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER
7
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.4621 of 2021
ORDER;
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous.
In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
SD/- B. CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTI^R //TRUE COPY// ect^oIii^Ffi^r
To,
1. One CC to SRI. N ASHWANI KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies csb
fizj'ilU
J
HIGH COURT
DATED:18/08/2023
ORDER
WP.No.4621 of 2021
5 0 9 OCT 2iZ3
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking declaration that respondents' action of not extending time for construction of college survives for adjudication.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
One CC to SRI N ASHWANI KUMAR
The Collector and District Magistrate
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadd
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
