Petitioner filed a contempt case for willful violation of orders in W.P. No. 20667 of 2022. Learned counsel submitted that respondents had complied with the orders, and no further punishment was deemed necessary.
The contempt case is closed without passing any orders as to costs or punishment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI,^
FRIDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE tnfi I
n
Y
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU N1MMA<^
H
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 63 OF 2023
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to issue summons under Sections 10 to 12, 14,15 and 16 of Act 70 of 1971 to punish the respondents for Contempt of Court Act for willful violation of orders of this Hon’ble Court made in WP NO.20667 of 2022, dated 25-07-2022.
Between:
...PETITIONER.
AND
...CONTEMNORS/ RESPONDENTS.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri BOKKA SATYANARAYANA KAMLA Counsel for the Respondent 1, 2, 4: Sri KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI Counsel for the Respondent 3: Sri S NISCHALA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.5: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE No.63 of 2023
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 25.07.2022 passed by this Court in W.P-No.20667 of 2022.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 25.07.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20667 of 2022, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY,REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SEC OFFICER
buildings. Velagapudt, Amarvati,
2. known aged about Major presently working as
District Collector, East godavari District Kakinada.
DPK AL
HIGH COURT
DPK
DATED:18/08/2023
ORDER
CC.No.63 of 2023
U cx)piu^
^^"and ^
2 2 <1 <1 NOV NOV 2023 2023
*. Current Section
CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to issue summons to punish respondents for contempt in view of willful non-compliance with earlier orders.
Whether the respondents have complied with the impugned order dated 25.07.2022 in W.P. No 20667 of 2022.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pappula Ramarao
Sri Gopala Krishna Dwivedi
Kruthika Sukla
Sri Samshed Singh Rawath
Sri Krishna kumari
Sri Sana Prasad
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
