In a contempt case, the petitioner submitted that respondents complied with the impugned order. The court accepted the submission and closed the contempt case without costs.
Contempt case closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV^fyVur?
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF AUGUS TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
nil
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 660 OF 2023
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, for their willful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 18.04,2022 passed in I.A. No.1 of 2022 in W,P. No. 9889 of 2022.
Between:
Mala Kishtanna, S/o. Chennaiah, aged 42 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H.No.4-61, SC Colony, Nallachelimela Village, Devanakonda Mandal, Kurnool District.
...Petitioner/Petitioner
AND
1. Sri S S Rawat, I.A.S, Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District,
2. Sri Sashi Bhushan Kumar, IAS, Special Chief Secretary, Water Resources Irrigation and CAD Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District,
3. Sri Reddy Sekhar Reddy, Superintending Engineer, HNSS Circle-1. Kurnool, Kurnool District.
4. Sri Reddy Sekhar Reddy, Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Minor Irrigation Works Division, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
...Respondents/Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMESH BABU TALLURI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI ASHOK RAM V
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SMT. S.SIVA KUMARI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3,4: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following:
4
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE No.660 of 2023
ORDER;
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 18.04.2022 passed by this Court in I.A.No.l of 2022 in W.P.No.9889 of 2022.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 18.04.2022 passed by this Court in I.A.No.l of 2022 in W.P.No.9889 of 2022, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed.
No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the
contempt case shall stand closed.
SD/- K TATA RAO
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
sree
' 4
HIGH COURT
DATED: 17/08/2023
ORDER
CC.No.660 of 2023
andw ^
X 2 1 NUV 2223
Current Section
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS
PBK
Mala Kishtanna
Sri S S Rawat
Sri Sashi Bhushan Kumar
Sri Reddy Sekhar Reddy
Sri Reddy Sekhar Reddy
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
