Writ petitions filed for release of EMD and retention amounts were dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or submit representations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI^^ (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
ft
Is
w
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 35951 OF 2012
Between:
Sri- Avantika - Sai Venkata Engineering (J.V), and contractors Ren Rv Authorized person S. Madhusudhana Rao S/o. N Naqeshwar Rao Aaed
...PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS
tho z.Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in affidavit filed therewith, the High Coirt may be fh! n ? * ?" appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in mandamus declaring the action of the respondents h reteS7f lTamn?“r‘®t P®®*®"" “''ered unde? EMD and “S,"iXe-Si'-s?; “£;"s respondents to immediately release the amounts payable to the petitioner covered under EMD and retention arnounts, in respect of Package No. HNSS PHASE-ll/15 i.e Investigation Design Construction of Tunnel in complete shape on HNSS
LA. NO: 1 OF 2012fWPMP. NO: 45698 OF 2012^
in thP Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated n the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ruXa bln'^’of IT ? "o 1 % amounts from the HNSS® PHASE m?s *'‘i'°"®7°'".®^‘^® maintenance in respect of the Package No. Co^nsTrurHnn „/t "''®""gation, Design & Drawings, Excavation and Construction of Tunnel in complete shape on HNSS Main Canal from Km
412.000 to Km 415.500 under phase- II, the duly providing approaches of 1 50 Mts on both sides pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITON NO.35951 OF 2012
ORDER;
On , 0-1.08.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was posted to today
under the caption Tor dismissal’. Even today also there is
no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This indicates that the petitioner herein has no interest in
prosecuting the Writ Petition.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non
prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending
shall stand closed.
SD/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
<br>
//TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To,
• '5h
HIGH COURT
DATED;02/08/2023
ORDER
WP.No.35951 of 2012
G
g 2 5 SEP 2823 m
★
^ ’ '’^L£?SPATC2ig^««^
DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION
Sri Avantika - Sai Venkata Engineering
The Executive Engineer, H.N.S.S
Assistant Pay & Account Officer, Chittor
Government Pleader for Irrigation
Government Pleader for Finance & Planning
VenkateswARLU Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
