The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a writ petition filed in 2013 for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or submit representations on the date of hearing in 2023.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AWIARAVATI^*
(Special Original(SpecialJurisdiction)Original Jurisdiction)
i
WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 10399 OF 2013
Between:
Shahani Residency, Hyderabad, 3"^ Floor, D. No. 6- 3-680/8/3, Thakur Mansion Lane, Somajigiida, Hyderabad, represented by its Power of Attorney holder Mr. Khaja Ahmed.
...PETITIONER
AND
Executive Engineer, GNSS, Division, Renigunta, Tirupathi, Chittoor ulsinci.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be appropriate writ or a direction and more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents in ?ADx government memo no. Prl. Secretary for pre closer of the agreement bearing no. 9SE/2007-2008, dated 26-06-2007 as per the recommendation of the 4‘^ Ijspondent as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 19(i)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to take action as per government memo no. Prl. Secretary (AR)pesi/012/2012, dated 16-11-2012
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPIVIP. NO: 12898 OF 2013)
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be Prespondents not to invoke the bank guarantees submitted company towards mobilization advance amount for a sum of Rs. 9,75,60,000/- pending "disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. K V RAJASREE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA
The Court made the following: ORDER
J
THE HON*BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU WIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITON NO. 10399 OF 2013
ORDER;
On 01.08.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was posted to today under the caption Tor dismissal’. Even today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This indicates that the petitioner herein has no interest in
prosecuting the Writ Petition.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending
shall stand closed.
<br>
S/or V. SAVITRI GOWRI
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To, SECTION OFFICER
1. One CO to SRI. K V RAJASREE Advocate [OPUC]
Andhra^P “des^hJOUn ® “E''’
High Court Of
3. Two CO Copies
Csb
, Sdkr
HIGH COURT
DATED:02/08/2023
ORDER
WP.No.10399 of 2013
fe 0 5 OCT 2023 m
^^^iSPATCH^^
DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
SHAHANI RESIDENCY
CHIEF ENGINEER, TELUGU GANGA PROJECT
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, TGP & GNSS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GNSS
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
