The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted permission to withdraw the writ petition challenging a Vehicle Check Report and ordered the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted. Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
&
A
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARA1^W^&/'
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2124 OF 2020
Between:
Sri Ramanjaneya Constructions and Lifters, Rep by its Managing Partner, Bobbili, Venkateswara Rao, S/o Khadeswaraswmy, aged Krapa, Ainavilli Mandal, East Godavari District. 52 years, Hindu, R/o D. No. 1-34,
, ...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Transport, Roads and Buildings Department, Secretariat Buildings Vegajapudi,
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly, 3^^ respondent in issued the Vehicle Check Report vide AP 205/Aug 2019/060427, dated 31-08-2019 relating the Construction Equipment Vehicle vide Registration No. NLO2G7089 is illegal. Arbitrary, violation of A.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act 193 and Rules (vi) vide G.O.Ms. No. 43, dated 17-072019, Violation of principles of natural justice and volition of the Constitutional rights under the constitution of India and without following due procedure known to law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay the Vehicle Check Report vide AP 205/Aug 2019/060427, dated 31-08-2019 relating the Registration No. NLO2G7089 by the 3rd respondent relating the Construction Equipment Vehicle Registration No. NLO2G7089 by way collecting the amount as per the Rules (vi) vide G.O.Ms. No. 43, dated 17-07-2019, pending the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): Ms. K.V.N. PALLAVI FOR SRI G SIMHADRI
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3 : GP FOR TRANSPORT
The Court made the following: ORDER
♦
j
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
Writ Petition Wo.2124 of 2020
ORDER:
Ms.K.V.N.Pallavi, learned counsel representing learned
counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to
withdraw the present writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, in this Writ Petition
shall stand closed.
Sd/- B PRABHAKAR O ASSISTA^REGj^TER //TRUE COPY// “^fiFFICER SEC To, 1. OneCCto SRI. G SIMHADRI Advocate [OPUC] Two CCsI to GP FOR TRANSPORT, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] . Two CD Copies MSR MSR
/
High court
DATED:17/04/2023
ORDER
WP.No.2124 of 2020
■4
. 34"^
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Ramanjaneya Constructions and Lifters, Rep by its Managing Partner, Venkateswara Rao
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Regional Transport Officer, Kakinada
RTA Amalapuram/Motor Vehicles Inspector, Amalapuram
V. SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
