The High Court dismissed a second appeal under Section 100 C.P.C. having been withdrawn by the appellant after parties entered into a compromise. No order as to costs.
The second appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS
SECOND APPEAL NO: 560 OF 2021
Appeal under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Judgmentand decree dated 26-10-2021 passed in A.S.No.26 of 2020 on thefileofIVAdditionalDistrict Judge, Ananthapuramu preferred against the Judgment and decree dated 02/12/2019 passed in O.S.No.58 of 2015 on the fileoftheCourtoftheSenior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram, Ananthapuram District.
Between:
M. Lakshmi Kanthamma, W/o. Late Maddana Ramakrishna, Aged about 46 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. D.No. 8-115, Gandhi Nagar,Dharmavaram. ...Appellant/Defendant/Defendant
AND
...Respondents/Appellants/Plaintiffs
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of passing of Final Decree in pursuance to Judgment and Decree passed by the Court of IV Additional District Judge, Ananthapuramu,inA.S.No.26of2020.
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Band! Srihari
Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. SRINIVAS
SECOND APPEAL No.560 OF 2021
JUDGMENT;
Sri Bandi Srihari, learned counsel for the appellant,fileda letter, dated 03.10.2023, before the Registry statingthatasthe matter was compromised, he was instructed by the appellantto withdraw the second appeal and requested to post the matter under the caption Tor withdrawal’. Hence, the matter came up today under the caption for withdrawal’. The said letter also contains the signature of the appellant.
Learned counsel for the appellant is present and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the second appealasthe matter was compromised.
Learned counsel for the respondents is present and submits that the parties have entered into compromise. In view of the contents of the letter and submissions made by both the learned counsel, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/- E. KAMESWARA RAO DEPUTY^ REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC flWOFFICER
To, 1. The IV Additional District Judge, Ananthapuram, AnanthapuramDistrict. 2. The Senior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram, AnanthapuramDistrict. 3. One CC to Sri Bandi Srihari, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of A.P. at Amaravati 6. Three CD Copies. ssb
' ^
HIGH COURT
DATED: 17/10/2023
ORDER
SA.No.560 of 2021
^ Copfe3 28lzlz4DSU
m
O";'■I
MM 201't
SsnUoR
.^5>-r
^cv'
DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
M. Lakshmi Kanthamma
Chinta Lakshmi Devi
Chinta Savitramma
G. Bharathi
Dasari Yashoda
Bandaru Leelavathi
V. Srinivas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
