Single judge dismissed a civil revision petition as infructuous because the underlying civil suit had already been dismissed in the lower court on 31.12.2021, rendering the revision an act without purpose.
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
« V
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6828 OF 2017
Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India aggrieved by the order dated 13/11/2017 in lA No.298 of 2017 in O S No. 125 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Jduge Nandyal Kurnool District.
Between:
Beeram Venkata Subba Reddy, S/o Narayana Reddy, aged 45 years, R/o S. Koturu Village,Panyam Mandal, Kurnool District
... Petitioner/Petitioner/PlaintifF
AND
...RESPONDENTS
LA. NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP. NO: 8779 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OS No. 125/2009 on the fileofthe II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. KARRI MURALI KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent N0.2: SRI O MANOHER REDDY
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
C.R.P.No.6828 af.^nir
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition arises out of an interlocutory order dated 13.11.2017 in I.A.No.298 of 2017 in O.S.No.125 of 2009, passed by learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District.
As per the status of the suit O.S.No.125 of 2009 i n e-courts, it is shown that the suit was dismissed with costs on 31.12.2021.
The Civil Revision Petition is therefore dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed.
naidu assistant registrar
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECilON OFFICER
AL i 'ci;TQ
HIGH COURT
DATED: 22/12/2023
ORDER
CRP.No.6828 of 2017
?fo“
3^
o
..Civ9.iy 2 9 APR /O'/'i r
^*^=5£jSPATCW5St^^
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
(N'u
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition remains maintainable after the underlying suit has been dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Beeram Venkata Subba Reddy
Bujuti Subbamma
Parvathi Gad Muni Reddy
Baga Laxmi Narayanainma
Ny pathway Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
