The High Court dismissed Civil Revision Petition No. 5094 of 2016 for default as the petitioner failed to appear or file representation on multiple hearing dates.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for default; all miscellaneous petitions stood dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ;; AMARAVATI
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5094 OF 2nifi
90 ns Constitution of India aggrieved by the orderdated '■A No-502 of 2016 in O.S.No.1154 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
Between;
A ^®®'’3wamy, S/o Mallaya, Hindu, Aged about: 45 Yrs, Occ; Business R/o Near. American Hospital, Ajit Singh Nagar., Vijayawada, Krishna District.
...Petitioner/Defendant
AND
Ponapalh Yalamandha, S/o late Ramulu, Hindu, aged about; 45 Yrs, R/o. 43-816, Near. American Hospital, Ajit Singh Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
...Respondent/Plaintiff
CRPMP. NO: 6601 OF 2Q1fi
‘f’®' circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to stay of the exparte decree and Judgment dated 05-01-2016 in OS No 1154 of 2015 rwri d°'^® VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, at Vijayawada, pending disposal of the above C.R.P.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.J.V.N. PUNDAREEKAKSHUDU
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI P.V. VENKATA RAVI SANKAR
The Court made the following Order:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
C.R.P.No.5094 of 2016
ORDER:
There is no representation for petitioner on 08.11.2023 and 15.12.2023 and hence the case was posted for dismissal on 20.12.2023. Even on 20.12.2023, there was no representationandas last chance, case was posted to 21.12.2023. Even today i.e., 21.12.2023, there is no representation for petitioner. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shallstand dismissed.
SD/- M SRINIVAS f ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ) //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. The VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada,KrishnaDistrict. 2. One CC to Sri K.J.V.N. Pundareekakshudu Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri P.V. Venkata Ravi Sankar Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court ofA.P.at Amaravathi 5. Three CD Copies
sree
t
HIGH COURT
DATED:21/12/2023
ORDER
CRP.No.5094 of 2016
o
;:o
2 9 APR 2029
DISMISSING THE C.R.P. FOR DEFAULT
1 («p'(2/)
pate
'Ol
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition should be dismissed for default due to lack of petitioner representation.
Whether the impugned order and associated miscellaneous petitions should stand dismissed.
A Ravishankar
Ponapalh Yalamandha
Nyathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
