Dismissed

Sri Madineedi Venkata Ramakrishna v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC11 Dec 2023CRLP/5260/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing an FIR due to non-prosecution, as petitioners failed to appear or file representation after being posted under dismissal caption, indicating lack of interest to pursue the case.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed for lack of interest to prosecute due to non-prosecution.

Sri Madineedi Venkata Ramakrishna Vs the… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Andhra Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

MONDAY THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5260 OF 2018

¶6

Between:

¶7

Sri Madineedi Venkata Ramakrishna, S/o Venkataratnam, Aged 33 years. R/o.D.no.50-100-1,TPT Colony, Seethammadhar, Visakhapatnam.

¶8

Ghanta Suneetha Chowdry, Proprietress M/s. G.S.Constructions, D/o Krishna Murthy Ghanta, Age: 30 years, R/o.Flat No. 103, Lakshmi Madura Heights Road No.3,P.M.Palem,Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam.

¶9

...Petitioners/Accused 2&8

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Through Sub-Inspector of Police, Police Station, Arilova Visakhapatnam.

¶12

Sri G.V.Ramana Murthy, S/o Late Raghava Rao, Occ; Branch/Chief Manager Union Bank of India, Gitam Campur Branch, Visakhapatnam R/o.Flat No 10 Raga Suvasa Apartment, Assam Gardens, Neelam Vepachettu Junction ’ Visakhapatnam, AP.

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court mayr. be pleased to call for the record in the FIR No.279 of 2017 dated 19.09.2017 on the file of the PS Arilova, Visakhapatnam and quash the same as the same is arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to the established principles of law.

¶15

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2018

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in FIR No.279 of 2017 dated 19.09.2017 on the file of the PS Arilova, Visakhapatnam.

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K Ratnam, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1.

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

¶20

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.5260 OF 2018

¶22

ORDER;

¶23

There is no representation for the petitioners on 04.12.2023. Therefore, this Court directed to post^thismatter under the dismissal caption. Despite the matter being posted under the dismissal caption, there is no representation for the petitioners.

¶24

Therefore, it evinces that the petitioners have no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, the present Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶25

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending^inthis Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

¶26

SDI- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Sub-Inspector of Police Arilova, Police Station, Visakhapatnam 2. Sri G.V.Ramana Murthy, S/o Late Raghava Rao, Occ: Branch/Chief Manager Union Bank of India, Gitam Campur Branch, Visakhapatnam R/o.Flat No.10, Raga Suvasa Apartment, Assam Gardens, Neelam Vepachettu^Junction Visakhapatnam, AP.

¶31

One CC to Sri K. Ratnam, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies SVR sree

¶32

HIGH COURT DATED:11/12/2023

ORDER

CRLP.No.5260 of 2018

S CoPfeS DSL-

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Sri Madineedi Venkata Ramakrishna v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Madineedi Venkata Ramakrishna v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Relince General Insurance Company Limited Vs Somu Venkata Reddy

M/S. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs Kuruva Eramma and 4 Others

K.v.Ramana Reddy Vs B.Jaya Nagenswara Reddy

B.Sathyanarayana Vs State of Ap.

Sri Dhanakshmi Spinning Mills Vs the State of A.P.

D. Subba Rao, Vs Ranjith Bhargav(Dismissed)