Dismissed

Sri Dhanakshmi Spinning Mills v. the State of A.P.

Andhra Pradesh HC11 Dec 2023CRLP/5241/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed Criminal Petition No. 5241 of 2018 for non-prosecution. The court observed that there was no representation from the petitioners despite the matter being under dismissal caption, evidencing lack of interest to prosecute the case.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

Sri Dhanakshmi Spinning Mills Vs the State… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Andhra Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

MONDAY .THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5241 OF 2018

¶6

Between:

¶7

o/®' Sri Dhanakshmi Spinning Mills, A Partnership Firm, 81. Pillayarkovil Street, Pallapalayam (PO), Mangalam (Via), Tirupur District Tamilnadu State.

¶8

^ [^^'^nisamy. Aged about 40 years, Occ; Partner, M/s. Sri MangalamDhanalakshrni(Via),SpinningTirupur District,Mills, 81,TamilnaduPillayarkovilState. Street, Pallapalayam (PO)''

¶9

...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1&2

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of A.P.. Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court, Hyderabad.

¶12

Anna Narashirn^a Rao, Proprietor, Sri Laxmi Narashima Rao Cotton Traders Having Office Office at D.No.20-09-18, Etukur Road, Guntur, A.P.

¶13

...Respondent/Complainant

¶14

',h° 'hat in the circumstances Stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court mav be pleased to quash the Criminal Complaint No. 351 of 2017 on the file of V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur and grant such other reliefs as it deems fit in the circumstances of the case.

¶15

I.A. NO: 1 OF 201«

¶16

Staten Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances he ^eeserf? Criminal Petition, the High Court may nn fh I further proceedings of criminal Compliant No.^351of2017 on the file of V Additional Munsif, Magistrate, Guntur and grant such other reliefs as it deems fit in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P. Prabhakar, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

■s.

¶19

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶20

CRIMINAL PETITION No.5241 OF 2018

¶21

ORDER;

¶22

There is no representation for the petitioners on 04.12.2023. Therefore, this Court directed to post^this matter under the dismissal caption. Despite the matter being posted under the dismissal caption, there is no representation^forthe petitioners.

¶23

Therefore, it evinces that the petitioners have no^interestto prosecute the case. Hence, the present Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶24

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending^inthis

¶25

Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

¶26

SD/- SHAIK MOHD. RAF! ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶27

//TRUE COPY//

¶28

SECTION OFFICER

¶29

To, 1. The V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur. Havfnn SfJl' ^arashima Rao Cotton Traders, Havii^ Office Office at D.No.20-09-18, Etukur road,^GunturAP 3. One CC to Sri P. Prabhakar, Advocate [OPUC] 5 Th?ee C^D Copies^^''^ Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.^{at Amaravathi[OUT]} SVR sree

HIGH COURT

DATED:11/12/2023

ORDER

CRLP.No.5241 of 2018

■A'
I
c
/3- t
^ n * C.'
lio .? 0 MAS Cj }
£
V
yf ’■ CVV- '• »!'
. ..-M ■.

¶35

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Sri Dhanakshmi Spinning Mills v. the State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Dhanakshmi Spinning Mills v. the State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Relince General Insurance Company Limited Vs Somu Venkata Reddy

M/S. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs Kuruva Eramma and 4 Others

K.v.Ramana Reddy Vs B.Jaya Nagenswara Reddy

B.Sathyanarayana Vs State of Ap.

Sri Madineedi Venkata Ramakrishna Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

D. Subba Rao, Vs Ranjith Bhargav(Dismissed)