L.Narayana Babu v. State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash FIR No.74/2019. The court closed the petition because the police had already filed a charge sheet. Petitioners may assail the charge sheet via other petitions.
What did the court decide?
Closed the criminal petition on FIR quashal on the record of charge sheet filing and explicitly permitted accused to assail the charge sheet.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¥ -s
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVA
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2348 OF 2019
Between:
- Laveti Narayana Babu, S/o. L. Venkata Rao aged about 40 years, R/o Perikedu (PO), Jairamesh Colony, D.No.2-69, Kapulapadu Mandal, Krishna District.
- Bandaru Siva Satyanarayana, S/o. Krishna Rao, aged about 46 years, R/o Perikedu (PO), Jairamesh Colony,
o S' Kapulapadu Mandal, Krishna District. 3. Kotturu Anjaneyulu, S/o. Venkateswara Rao aged about 60 years, R/o. Perikedu (PO), Bapulapadu Mandal, Harijanavada, Krishna District.
- Vegireddy Paparao, S/o. Appalaswamv aged about 65 years, R/o. D. No. 4-44, Check Post Centre Perikedu (PO), Bapulapadu Mandal, Krishna District
- Singavarapu Durga Prasad, aged about 41 years, R/o. Perikedu (PO), Sundarayya Colony, Kapulapadu Mandal, Krishna District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Laveti Narayana Babu
- petitioner
Bandaru Siva Satyanarayana
- petitioner
Kotturu Anjaneyulu
- petitioner
Vegireddy Paparao
- petitioner
Singavarapu Durga Prasad
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/2348/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court