Dismissed

Chalasani Venkata Lakshmi v. The State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC12 Dec 2023CRLP/11517/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati bench considered a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing proceedings. The Court held the petition infructuous due to settlement between parties out of court and dismissed it, closing all pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous due to settlement; all pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

Chalasani Venkata Lakshmi Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Andhra Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11517 OF 2018

¶6

Between:

¶7

Chalasani Venkata Lakshmi, W/o. Rambabu, aged about 53 years, R/o. Flat No.2B, 2nd Floor, Ramspride apartment, 0pp. NAC Kalyanamandapam, Gurunanak Colony, Vijayawada.

¶8

Chalasani Rambabu, S/o. Ramchandra Rao, aged about 57 years, R/o. Flat No.2B, 2nd Floor, Ramspride apartment, 0pp. NAC Kalyanamandapam, Gurunanak Colony, Vijayawada.

¶9

Gutta Dwija, W/o. Gutta Nani, aged about 31 years, R/o. Flat No.2B, 2nd Floor, Ramspride apartment, 0pp. NAC Kalyanamandapam, Gurunanak Colony, Vijayawada.

¶10

Gutta Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Prasad @ Gutta Nani, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, aged about 35 years, R/o. Flat No.2B, 2nd Floor, Ramspride apartment, 0pp. NAC Kalyanamandapam, Gurunanak Colony, Vijayawada.

¶11

Kolli Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Pitchaiah, aged about 70 years, R/o. Kolli Venkateswara Rao Street, Chowdarypet, Ashoknagar, Kanuru, Vijayawada.

¶12

...Petitioners/Respondent Nos. 2 to 6

¶13

AND

¶14

The State of AP, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, Hyderabad.

¶15

Chalasani Asakiran @ Nadikatia Asakiran, W/o. Chalasani Venkata Durga Nagarjuna, D/o. Nadikatia Rama Mohana Rao, aged about 28 years, R/o. Plot No.2/2, Satyam Residency, Pakeergudem, Besides Screw Bridge, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶16

...Respondents

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in DVC.No.86 of^2017onthe file of the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada,^{KrishnaDistrict.}

¶18

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2018

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in DVC.^{No.86of2017,onthefileof} the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District, including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of the criminal petition.

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing^{theMemorandumof} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments^{ofSriVRAvula,} Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.

¶21

The Court made the following Order:

¶22

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION No.11517 OF 2018

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Mr.K.Rama Rao, learned counsel representing Mr.V.R.Avula, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the parties have settled the matter out of the Court and the matter has become infructuous, hence, prayed to dismiss the petition and learned counsel also endorsed the same on the record to that effect.

¶26

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as^infructuous.

¶27

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this

¶28

criminal petition shall stand closed.

SDI- U SRIDEVI

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To, 1. The I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada. 2. One CC to Sri V R Avula, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi. [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies

RDB sree

r--* ^

HIGH COURT

DATED:12/12/2023

ORDER

CRLP.No.11517of 2018

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

Chalasani Venkata Lakshmi v. The State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chalasani Venkata Lakshmi v. The State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Sathyanarayana Vs State of Ap.

Sri Dhanakshmi Spinning Mills Vs the State of A.P.

Sri Madineedi Venkata Ramakrishna Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

B.Krishna naik Vs The State of Ap.

Nannapaneni Ankineedu Prasad Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

B.Pedda Venkataeswarlu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh And Another