In a contempt case filed for non-compliance of a High Court order, the petitioner submitted that the earlier order had been complied with. The court accepted this submission and closed the contempt case.
The present Contempt Case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE ij PRESENT I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5719 OF 2022
"'f T' Contempt of Courts Act of Punish the Respondents herein for willfully violating, disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 05.07.2022 in W.P. 18868 of 2022.
Between;
...PETITIONER AND
Reddy Sekhar Reddy, Superintendent
Engineer, Irrigation Circle,
Kurnool, Kurnool District. (R-3)
^ 5 Raghu Rami Reddy, Executive Engineer
Nandyal, Kurnool District. (R-4) ^ WRD, Ml Works Division,
...CONTEMNORS
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. BATHALA RAMESH
Counsel for the Respondent R1: SMT S SIVA KUMARI
Counsel for the Respondent R2: SRI ASHOK RAM V
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.5719 of 2022
ORDER;
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this Court dated 05.07.2022 in W.P.No. 18868 of 2022 has been complied with.
- Accordingly, the present Contempt Case is closed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any.
shall stand closed.
SD/- U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
//TRUE COPY//
cs^
SECTION OFFICER
DepartrenflS^^ '^rigation (Water (R-1) ^ ' department, Secretariat, Amaravati,GunturDistrict.
PRK
L\ dvYO,
HIGH COURT
DATED:25/07/2023
ORDER
CC.No.5719 of 2022
CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED
Vo
Shashi Bhushan Kumar
S SIVA KUMARI
Ashok Ram V
R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
