Contempt order dismissing the case due to lack of further interest by the petitioner after compliance with a previous order, marking the closure of pending miscellaneous petitions.
Contempt case dismissed; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.3253 of 2022
ORDER:
There is no representation for the petitioner on 28.03.2023, 21.04.2023, 22.06.2023 and today also.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if
any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
21.07.2023 BSM
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.3253 of 2022
21.07.2023
BSM
Petitioner
Respondents
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
