Contempt petition filed for violation of court orders. Petitioner argued compliance occurred. Court recorded submission that respondents complied with dated 10.12.2021 order and closed the case without costs.
Contempt case closed without costs and no further orders required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
•
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
^
/AS/ JSSSi V,
la.
A.
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3146 OF 2022
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents No.1 to 5 for v/illfulviolationanddeliberate disobedience to the Order of this Hon'ble Court dated 10.12.2021 passed in l.A.No.1 of 2021 in W.P. No.29169 of 2021 as contemplatedundersections10to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Between;
Mr. Arasu Venkata Ramana Reddy, S/o. Mr. A. Srinivasa Reddy Aged about 53 years, Occ; Contractor R/o. H.No. 3-45, Gadigarevula Village, Gadivemula Mandal, Kurnool District.
AND
(Causetittle amended as per Court Order dt.04/11/2022.VidelANo.2of 2022. In CC No.3146 of 2022).
(R 5 Leave granted as per Court order dt.30/08/2022VidelaNo.1of2022 inCC No.3146 of 2022).
...Respondents/Contemnors
lA NO; 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to implead Respondent No.5 as party to this contempt case.
lA NO: 2 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the cause title of the Respondent No. I in the above Contempt case in affidavit and main petitionas"Shri. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department (Irrigation & CAD), Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, A.P." in the place of "Sri.Pankaj Kumar, Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department (Irrigation & CAD), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District".
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V NITESH
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SMT. S SIVA KUMARI
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI ASHOK RAM V
The Court made the following Order:
\
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE No.3146 of 202J
ORDER;
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwilful disobedience of the orders dated 10.12.2021 passed by this Court ini:: I.A.No.l of 2021 in W.P.No.29169 of 2021.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 10.12.2021 passed by this Court in I.A.No.l of 2021 in W.P.No.29169 of 2021, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case isclosed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
SD/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR
/
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
GR
HIGH COURT
DATED:07/08/2023
ORDER
CC.No.3146 of 2022
KP
I / C£r-pr(L^
\G f
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS
u -v
tr
% a
V.
. v: 'h
't'
<-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be reopened after respondents claimed compliance with the impugned order.
Whether relief is appropriate where compliance has been established by the respondents.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mr. Arasu Venkata Ramana Reddy
Shri Shashi Bhushan Kumar
Sri Reddy Sekhar Reddy
Sri C. Prathap
Sri H. Mohan Rao
Sri V. Tirumaleswara Reddy
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
