The High Court closed this writ petition filed by a private company challenging tender disqualification as infructuous because the cause of action was considered time-barred for a period of one year, resulting in no further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV, (Special Original Jurisdiction)
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV, A (Special Original Jurisdiction) I FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST % ? c- TWO THOUSAND ANO TWENTY THREE 6a^1z PRESENT 'IH J.*
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 3774 OF 2018
Between:
M/s. PLR Projects Pvt. Ltd., Flat No.502, Sirimalle Towers, Punjagutta, Hyderabad Rep. by its General Manager Sri C. Chandra Sekhar Reddy, S/o. Late C Venkata Subba Reddy, aged about 49 years, R/o. D.No.12-2-826/A/35, F-303, 3rd Floor N.T. Raju Estate, L1C Colony, Mehadipatnam, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents as illegal and arbitrary in disqualifying the petitioner's hid contrary to the tender notification in Tender Notice No.28/2017-18 dated 22.11.2017 and direct the Respondents to declare the petitioner as fully eligible and qualified for the Tender Notice No.28/2017-18 dated 22.11.2017 and direct the Respondents to award the tender in favour of the petitioner.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein to consider the petitioner's bid in Tender Notice No.28/2017-18 dated 22.11.2017 along with the other bids, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. R. ANNAPURNA Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 4: GP FOR IRRIGATION & CAD The Court made the following: ORDER
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.3774 of 2018
ORDER;
Sri N. Srinivas, learned counsel represented learned submits that this writ petition counsel for the petitioner dated 22.11.2017 which was challenging the tender notice and cause in the writ petition issued for a period of one year and hence, the writ does not survive for further adjudication petition becomes infructuous.
In view of the above, the Writ Petition is closed as infructuous.
Consequenay, MisceUaneous Petitions, it any, pending in
the writ petition shall stand closed. SD/-SHAIKMOHD.Wn / ASSISTANTticTANT registrarREGISTPi
//TRUE COPY//
3. Two CD Copies Sdkr
Sdkr
HIGH COURT
DA'’’ED:O4/O8/2O23
ORDER
WP.No.3774 of 2018
Al
5 29 SEP 2323 Sj
oiZ
wthout S “ ""='’‘''=™ous
M/s. PLR Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Commissioner, Commissioner of Tenders
The Superintending Engineer, Telugu Ganga Project
The Chief Engineer (Projects)
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
