Padmaraju M I Tank Water Users v. Sri Vangala Srinivasulu Reddy
Case brief
What is this about?
Hearing a contempt case filed for wilful disobedience of earlier orders, the court noted the respondent's submission of compliance and ordered the closure of the pending contempt case without costs.
What did the court decide?
Closed the contempt case noting compliance with earlier orders. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE No.224 of 2022
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 05.11.2021 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in W.P.No.21868 of 2021.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 05.11.2021 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in W.P.No.21868 of 2021, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
____________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
07.08.2023 TPS
2
215
Coram
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/224/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court