This court dismissed a contempt case without costs after the petitioner's counsel submitted that no further orders were necessary, simultaneously closing any pending miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SATURDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1019 OF 2019
Contempt case U/s. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the Respondents herein for wilfully violating and disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 02/11/2019 in WP No. 17278 of 2019.
Between:
V. T. Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Venkat Suryanarayana, Aged 53 years, Occ; Proprietor M/s. Radha Madhav Engineering Enterprises R/o. Plot No.62A, BlockD (Expan) Autonagar, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District,AndhraPradesh - 530 012
...Contempt Petitioner/Petitioner
AND
...Contemnors/Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. V. KRISHNAIAH
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI J.UGRANARASIMHA
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.l019 of 2023
ORDER;
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further
orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
Accordingly, this Contempt Case is dismissed. There shall
be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand
closed.
//true copy//
SDI- E. KAMESWARA RAO DEPUTY^E^I^^^*^ a SECtlON OFFICER
To, 1
ssb
HIGH COURT
DATED:23/12/2023
ORDER
CC.No.1019 of 2019
4CO
O
i
APR 202^
CCfi,
DISMISSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS
1 AL
V. T. Bhaskara Rao
Sri Madireddy Pratap
Sri V. Nageswara Rao
R. Raghunandan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
