The petitioner sought to withdraw a Writ Petition challenging an arbitrary removal from the post of Mandal-In-Charge. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
The Writ Petition No.37758 of 2012 was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION No.37758 of 2012
JUDGMENT:-
Sri G.L.Nageswar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted a letter dated 18.07.2022 to the Registrar Judicial, Andhra Pradesh High Court, on record submitting as follows:-
“ The subject referred Writ petition was filed by the petitioner to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing proceedings vide Proc Rc.No.585/2011H2 dated 10.07.2012 by reverting the petitioner from the post of the Mandal-in-Charge as No,-Technical Work Inspectors as illegal arbitrary highhanded and against the principles of natural justice and also violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set-aside the proceedings viz. Proc.Rc.No.585/2011H2 dated 10.07.2012 issued the 2nd respondent. It is informed by the petitioner through an email, during pendency of the writ petition he was promoted to the cadre of Assistant Engineer and requested me to with draw the writ petition as the cause does not survive. The copy of email is herewith enclosed for the kind perusal of the registry and also for the perusal of the Hon’ble court. Now the petitioner intends to with draw the present petition. Hence, I request the Hon’ble Registry, may kindly direct the section to list the matter before the Hon’ble court for withdrawl under “withdrawl caption” on priority basis and for such an action I will be grateful to the Hon’ble Registry.”
Sri K.Arjun, learned counsel, representing Sri G.L.Nageswar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn.
Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection.
In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No order as to costs.
2
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,
shall also stand closed.
RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
Date: 21.07.2022 SCS
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
118
WRIT PETITION No.37758 of 2012
Date: 21.07.2022
Scs
G.L. Nageswar Rao
2nd Respondent
Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
