M. Mallikarjuna, v. The State of A.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution after the petitioner made no representation on the dates of hearing listed in 2022.
The Writ Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution after the petitioner made no representation on the dates of hearing listed in 2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION No.3697 of 2015
JUDGMENT:-
No representation from the side of the petitioner.
On 05.07.2022 also, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was listed under the caption ‘for dismissal'. Still, there is no representation.
The matter pertains to the year 2015 and it appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting the matter any further.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,
shall also stand closed.
__________________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
Date: 18.07.2022 SCS
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
4
WRIT PETITION No.3697 of 2015
Date: 18.07.2022
Scs
Petitioner
Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court