The writ petition (W.P.No.35087 of 2013) was dismissed as infructuous based on counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives. No order as to costs was passed, and pending miscellaneous applications were also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
W.P.No.35087 of 2013
ORDER:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the above submission, the writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
stand dismissed.
___________________________ Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J
Date:04.05.2022
HS
2
THE HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
W.P.No.35087 of 2013
Date: 04.05.2022
HS
K. Manmadhao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
