Dismissed

A.Ramanjaneyulu, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC23 Mar 2022WP/3267/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the eligibility of petitioners for promotion as Village Revenue Officers Grade-II, deciding to accord with a prior order directing the respondent to pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 3rd respondent to pass appropriate orders regarding the promotion of petitioners strictly in accordance with law within six weeks.

A.Ramanjaneyulu, Vs Government of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Andhra Pradesh HC (2022)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.3267 of 2021

¶3

JUDGMENT:-

¶4

Heard Sri C. Srinivasa Baba, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N. Ashwartha Narayana, learned Government Pleader for Services-I for the respondents.

¶5

The petition was filed for the following relief:

¶6

“ For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the claims of the Petitioners for promotion for the post of Village Revenue Officers Grade-II as per the placement in the 1^st final Seniority list Rc.No.A4/139/2020, dated 07.02.2020 and 2^nd seniority list Rc.No.A4/139/2020, dated 25.06.2020, which was prepared in accordance with the G.O.Ms.No.13 Revenue (SER.III) Department, dated 27.01.2020 and declare the impugned orders of the 3^rd respondent Rc.No.A4/139/2020 on 11.08.2020 deleting the names of the petitioners as ineligible is illegal, arbitrary and violation principles of natural justice apart from violation of articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

¶7

3 . Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition may be disposed of in terms of the order, dated 14.02.2022 passed in W.P.No.9055 of 2021, wherein the following order was passed:-

¶8

¶9

“This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

¶10

“….to issue a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the claims of the Petitioners for promotion for the post of Village Revenue Officers Grade-II as per the placement in the 1^st final seniority list Rc.No.376/2020/A2, dated 22.06.2020 which was prepared in accordance with the G.O.Ms.No.13, Revenue (SER.III) Department, dated 27.01.2020 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders….”

¶11

2. Though the learned counsel for petitioners advanced arguments with reference to the averments in the Writ Petition, this Court is inclined to consider his submissions for disposal of the Writ Petition, in terms of W.P.No.5290 of 2021, dated 05.01.2022, despite the vehement opposition of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I, seeking time for counter on behalf of the Department.

¶12

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 3^rd respondent to pass appropriate orders, in relation to the promotion of the petitioners, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs.

¶13

As a sequel, miscellaneous application, if any, pending shall stand disposed of.”

¶14

Learned Government Pleader for Services-I also submits that he has no objection in deciding the present petition in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.9055 of 2021, as the same controversy was also raised therein.

¶15

¶16

Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, this petition is also disposed of directing the 3^rd respondent/Collector & District Magistrate, Ananthapur District to pass appropriate orders in relation to the promotion of the petitioners strictly in accordance with law within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶17

No order as to costs.

¶18

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,

¶19

shall also stand closed.

¶20

__________________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J

¶21

Date: 23.03.2022

¶22

NOTE:-

¶23

Issue C.C. by 28.03.2022

B/o

SCS 11BbBBBBbB/BBB

76 76

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

¶30

WRIT PETITION No.3267 of 2021

¶31

Date: 23.03.2022

¶32

Scs

A.Ramanjaneyulu, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Ramanjaneyulu, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Rekha Mani, Vs the Secretary

Smt N.Ujwala Deepthi Latha Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

A.G.Srihari Babu, Vs the State of Ap

N Venkata Swamy Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Veeradasu Lakshmi Devi Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

V.R.Bhaskar Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh