Ayacut Dar Committee v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC19 Jul 2022WP/18294/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition regarding non-payment of a contract bill for jungle clearance, the Court directed authorities to complete verification within three weeks and pay the dues within six weeks, mandating payment immediately if verification was delayed or completed. A claim for interest is allowed in an appropriate forum.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to complete verification within three weeks and pay dues within six weeks. Immediate payment if verification not completed in time.

Ayacut Dar Committee Vs The State of Andhra… — Banking and Recovery | Andhra Pradesh HC (2022)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION No.18294 of 2022

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

The petitioner had been awarded the contract for taking up the “Neeru-Chettu” programme for jungle clearance and desilting of field channel from Sugali Naganna to Chakali Gopal fields near Banakacherla Village of KC Canal, vide Agreement No.1823/2018-19, dated 11.10.2018. After execution of the said work, a final bill for Rs.7,62,419/- had been prepared and submitted to the concerned for payment. As the payment of the said amount has not been made by the respondents, the petitioner had approached this Court, by way of this writ petition.

¶4

It is the contention of the petitioner that even though the respondents admitted that the petitioner is entitled for payment of the aforesaid sums of money, no payment is being made. The petitioner contends that such non-payment of money is clearly arbitrary and high-handed requiring the interference of this Court.

¶5

This Court, in various orders, including the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 05.10.2021 in W.P.No.10038 of 2021 and batch had taken the view that such non-payment of dues is arbitrary and that such dues need to be cleared by the respondents at the earliest.

¶6

The learned Government Pleader submits that the respondent authorities are verifying the claims of the petitioner

¶7

¶8

RRR,J W.P.No. 18294 of 2022

¶9

and would be in a position to make payment only after such verification is completed.

¶10

In view of the aforesaid directions of this Court in various cases and after hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Irrigation, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to complete the verification process within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter to pay the amount due to the petitioner depending upon the outcome of the verification, within a period of six weeks. It is clarified that in the event of the verification process not being completed within the aforesaid period of three weeks, the respondents shall pay the amounts due to the petitioner, without insisting upon any further time for verification. It would also be open to the petitioner to agitate his/her/their claim for interest, if any payable by the respondents, in an appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶11

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶12

____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.

¶13

19.07.2022 SSP

¶14

¶15

RRR,J W.P.No. 18294 of 2022

¶16

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶17

WRIT PETITION No.18294 of 2022

¶18

SSP

¶19

19.07.2022

Ayacut Dar Committee v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayacut Dar Committee v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravula Venkateswarlu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt. S. Rajeshwari, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh.

R Srinivasulu Vs the State of Ap

Bavirishetti Gopala Krishna Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

N.Balaraju Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Dharamukala Rambabu, Vs The Union of India