In a second appeal regarding a decree for money recovery, the High Court recorded the appellant's submission that the decree was satisfied. The court dismissed the appeal to confirm the lower courts' judgments.
The second appeal was dismissed confirming the judgments of the courts below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR. V. R. K. KRUPA SAGARY`
%`
SECOND APPEAL NO: 90 OF 2012
Appeal under Section 100 CPC., against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.21 of 2010, dt:28-11-2011 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge,Markapur, confirming the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.142 of 2003, dt: 6-4-2009 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Markapur.
Between:
Nallur Nageswara Rao, Sio. Venkateswarlu, Aged about 58 years, Village Revenue Officer, Rio. Medapi Village of Tripuranthakam Mandal, Prakasam District.
Appellant (Defendant/Appellant)
AND
Vunnagiri Nagabhushanam, S/o. Yallamanda, Aged about 65 years, Occ: Cultivation, Rio. Medapi Village, Tripuranthakam Mandal, Prakasam District.
Respondent (Plaintiff/Respondent)
IA NO: 1 OF 2012 (SAMP NO. 219 OF 2012)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in EP No. 197 of 2009 in OS NO. 142 of 2003 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Markapur, as Confirmed in AS No. 21/2010, dt. 2$-11-2011 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Markapur
IA NO: 2 OF 2012(SAMPNO. 921 OF 2012)
Between:
Vunnagiri Nagabhushanam, S/o. Yallamanda, Aged about 65 years, Occ: Cultivation, Rio. Medapi Village, Tripuranthakam Mandal, Prakasam District.
Petitioner/Respondent/ Respondent/Plaintiff
AND
Vunnagiri Nagabhushanam, S/o. Yallamanda, Aged about 65 years, Occ: Cultivation, Rio. Medapi Village, Tripuranthakam Mandal, Prakasam District. .....Respondent/Petitioner/Appellant/Defendant
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay order dr. 7-2-2012 made in SAMP No. 219 of 2012 in SA No. 90 of 2012.
Counsel for the Appellant: SMT. K. ARUNA, Advocate
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI. N. SRIRAM MURTHY, Advocate
The Curt made the following Judgment:-
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE DR. V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR
SECOND APPEAL No.90 of 2012
JUDGMENT:
Learned counsels on both sides are in attendance. This appeal is against the concurrent findings of two courts wherein the respondent/ plaintiff was granted decree for recovery of money.
Sd/- MRAMESHBABU DEPUTY REGITRAR //TRUECOPY// //,SEC-TIb FFICER
To: 1. TheSenior Civil Judge, Markapur 2. ThePrincipal Junior Civil Judge, Markapur 3. OneCC toSmt. K Aruna, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CCto Sri. N Sriram Murthy, Advocate [OPUC]
1 CL h
HIGH COURT
DATED: 18/08/2022
JUDGMENT:
SA.No.90 of 2012
rQJcS ° ANOTh t
a
03 N0V 2023 yid
* Current Section *
DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL
Nallur Nageswara Rao
Vunnagiri Nagabhushanam
V. R. K. Krupa Sagary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
