The Single Judge held that the Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying appeal had already been disposed of by the First Appellate Court.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DR. V R K KRUPA SAGAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1119 of 2018
O R D E R:
Sri V. Subrahmanyam, learned counsel for the revision petitioner is in attendance and submits that the same appeal was disposed of by the learned First Appellate Court and therefore, the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________________ JUSTICE DR. V R K KRUPA SAGAR
Date :-17.08.2022 ASH
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DR. V R K KRUPA SAGAR
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1119 of 2018
Dt.17-08-2022
ASH
Sri V. Subrahmanyam
DR. V R K KRUPA SAGAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
