Single-judge order disposing of a criminal petition. The court permits the trial to proceed while dispensing with the physical presence of the 2nd accused, who faced no specific allegations other than assisting the primary accused.
Trial permitted to proceed; presence of 2nd petitioner dispensed with except for examination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8802 of 2022
ORDER:-
The petitioners are Accused Nos.1 & 2 in C.C.No.46 of 2022 in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge Court-CumAdditional Judicial I Class Magistrate, Razole for the offences under Sections 323, 324, 506 and 109 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code.
2
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Date: 08.11.2022 MJA
3
165
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8802 of 2022
08.11.2022
MJA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the presence of the 2nd petitioner (who faced no specific allegations except assisting the 1st) is necessary for the trial to proceed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioners (Accused Nos. 1 & 2)
Defacto-complainant
R. Raghunandan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
