The Court allowed applications and quashed criminal proceedings upon settlement between the accused and the complainant. Closure was directed to ensure further amity between village residents. Pending petitions were closed.
Criminal Proceedings Quashed; Pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
I.A.Nos.3 & 3 of 2022
In/And CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.8188 of 2013 and 8702 of 2022
COMMON ORDER:
As these Criminal Petitions had been filed by accused Nos.1 and 2 respectively, they are being taken up together.
accused/petitioners are personally present before this Court and are identified by their respective counsel.
2
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
09.12.2022 RJS
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
I.A.Nos.3 & 3 of 2022 In/And CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.8188 of 2013 and 8702 of 2022
09.12.2022
RJS
4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether pending criminal proceedings should be quashed upon settlement between parties residing in the same village.
Accused No. 1
Accused No. 2
De facto complainant
Raghunandan Rao, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
