Court allowed applications and Criminal Petitions filed by accused and de facto complainant. Proceedings under Crime No.57 were quashed due to settlement and concern for village amity.
Proceedings in Crime No.57 of 2013 quashed; both applications and Criminal Petitions allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
I.A.Nos.3 & 3 of 2022
In/And CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.8188 of 2013 and 8702 of 2022
COMMON ORDER:
As these Criminal Petitions had been filed by accused Nos.1 and 2 respectively, they are being taken up together.
accused/petitioners are personally present before this Court and are identified by their respective counsel.
2
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
09.12.2022 RJS
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
I.A.Nos.3 & 3 of 2022 In/And CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.8188 of 2013 and 8702 of 2022
09.12.2022
RJS
4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Criminal Petitions filed by accused persons can be allowed based on settlement and quash proceedings leading to amity between parties in the same village.
de facto complainant
accused Nos.1 and 2
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
