Kanchi Srinivasa Rao v. Dr.K.Madhavi Latha.I.a.S
Case brief
What is this about?
Order dispensing with the presence of Petitioner – 1st Respondent and closing a separate Contempt Case given respondents' presence (Vide separate order).
Order dispensing with the presence of Petitioner – 1st Respondent and closing a separate Contempt Case given respondents' presence (Vide separate order).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No. C.C.No.2129 of 2022
PROCEEDING SHEET
| Sl. No. |
DATE | ORDER | OFFICE NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03. | 14.09.2022 | MGR, J I.A.No.1/2022 Heard. For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and the |
|
| submissions made, presence of the |
|||
| petitioner – 1strespondent before this | |||
| Court today i.e., on 14.09.2022 is dispensed with. Accordingly, the application is ordered. |
|||
| ________ MGR, J C.C.No.2129/2022 Respondents 1 and 2 are present in person before this Court today i.e., on 14.9.2022. Contempt Case is closed. (_vide_separate order) |
|||
| ________ MGR, J CSR |
Respondents 1 and 2
MGR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court