Court closed a contempt case after counsel stated the impugned order was complied with. Recognized no further adjudication required. Adjourned pending applications.
Contempt case closed; no costs; pending applications closed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATHI
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE No.16 OF 2021
B.C.Prameela … Petitioner
Versus
N.Bharath Gupta and others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava Counsel for the respondents : Government Pleader for Revenue ORDER :
It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order alleging non-compliance of which the present Contempt Case has been filed, is complied with and nothing survives for adjudication in the matter.
In view of the submission made, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Date: 15.07.2022 BLV
______________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J
2
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE No.16 of 2021
Date: 15-07-2022
BLV
B.C. Prameela
N. Bharath Gupta and others
Ninala Jayasurya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
