Panyam Shaik Shahabaz Hussain v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous because the counsel submitted that the cause of action did not survive.
The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous because the counsel submitted that the cause of action did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NO.7732 OF 2021
ORDER :
Sri.J.U.M.V.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive, as such no further orders are required to be passed in this petition.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 11.08.2021 tm
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.7732 OF 2021
Date: 11-08-2021 tm
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court