This judgment dismisses I.A.No.2 of 2021, filed as a miscellaneous petition 'for being mentioned', holding that substantive issues regarding alleged errors based on specific legal principles cannot be decided at this stage.
Dismissal of I.A.No.2 of 2021 with liberty to file review or appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO.15571 OF 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
| SL. NO. |
DATE | ORDER | OFFICE NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06 | 30.11.2021 | MSM,J |
|
| I.A.No.2 of 2021 | |||
| This miscellaneous petition is filed under the caption ‘for being mentioned’, on the ground that the order is erroneous, as the petitioner is claiming relief basedon the principle laid down inRatnamma v. Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmavaram1. But, such issue cannot be decided while taking up the matter under the caption ‘for being mentioned’. If the petitioner is aggrieved by such an order, he may prefer an appeal or file review before this Court, if it is erroneous, in accordance with law. Hence, I.A.No.2 of 2021 is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the same before the Appellate Court by filing review or prefer an appeal. |
|||
| ________ MSM, J Sp |
1 2015 (6) ALD 609 (DB)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an issue regarding reliance on the principle in Ratnamma v. Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmavaram can be decided while taking up a miscellaneous petition captioned ‘for being mentioned’.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ratnamma v. Revenue Divisional Officer, DharmavaramReferred¶4
2015 (6) ALD 609 (DB)
MSM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
