This single-judge order in a writ petition challenging non-continuation in service observes that the petitioner attended duty as instructed and no oral hindrance exists, finding nothing remains for adjudication before disposal.
The writ petition was disposed of without adjudication on merits, leaving remedial options open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU WRIT PETITION No.3785 OF 2020
ORDER:-
This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.3 to 6 in not continuing the petitioners as a Field Assistant (Fixed Tenure Employees) with effect from 01.10.2019, despite the letter dated 14.05.2019, as illegal.
The learned counsel for petitioner talks of an oral order not to perform duties; Smt.J.Sumathi, learned Standing Counsel appears for the 5th respondent, Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6 states that absolutely no hindrance is being caused to the 1st petitioner in discharging his duties. Basing on the written instructions in RCC.No.10/E.G.S./ Amadaguru/2020, dated 17.02.2020, the leaned counsel submits that the 1st petitioner has attended duties on 17.02.2020. A copy of the written instructions was also given to learned counsel for the 1st petitioner.
Learned Government Pleader for Panchayatraj, representing respondent Nos.1 to 3 is present.
In view of the fact that the 1st petitioner has attended duty on 17.02.2020 and it is stated that there is no “oral hindrance”, this Court is of the opinion that nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioners to pursue their remedies for any other reliefs in case if they are so advised.
2
With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, in this Writ petition, shall stand closed.
________________________________ JUSTICE D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
Date : 19-02-2020
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
WRIT PETITION No.3785 OF 2020
Date : 19-02-2020
sdp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the action of respondent Nos. 3 to 6 in terminating the petitioners as Field Assistants is illegal.
The Petitioners
Respondent Nos. 3 to 6
D.V.S.S. Somayajulu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
