The Court allowed two writ petitions challenging rent collection notices issued by C.I.D. officers, holding that such notices were beyond the officers' jurisdiction based on earlier similar orders.
Impugned notices dated 13.06.2020 issued by C.I.D. officers for collection of rent were set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY WRIT PETITION Nos.22086 and 22098 of 2020
COMMON ORDER :
In these writ petitions, the petitioners question the validity of the impugned notices, dated 13.06.2020, issued by respondent No.2 for collection of rent.
2
CMR,J W.P.No.22086 and 22098 of 2020
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J
04th December, 2020 GHN
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the validity of rent collection notices issued by C.I.D. officers can be questioned when similar notices were earlier quashed by this Court?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.11795 of 2020Relied on¶5
W.P.No.11795 of 2020 and batch
Petitioners
Group Home
CID Officers
Cheekati Manavendirnanath Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
