Petitioner's counsel submitted the writ petition had no purpose and became infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous and closed related miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NO.3561 OF 2015
ORDER :
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no purpose survives for adjudication for further and became infructuous.
In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
12.11.2019 Rvk
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
