On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 6 submits that the petitioners have questioned the notice dated 18.09.2019 issued to them by the Court pursuant to the impugned docket order dated 16.09.2019 and they have not questioned the impugned docket order dated 16.09.2019 and on this ground alone the revision petition is liable to be dismissed. He further submits that against the impugned docket order only appeal lies under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC and revision is not maintainable. He further submits that once the trial Court applies its mind, sufficiency or insufficiency of reasons cannot be gone into and the power of Court is traceable to Section 11 of the Societies Registration Act, hence the decisions relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioners do not apply to the facts of the present case. He further submits that as per the Byelaws, all the members have to be elected only on one day, but toss was allowed contrary to byelaws and since the election is contrary to law, the trial Court has rightly granted injunction and there are no reasons to interfere with the same.
