Writ petition pending since 1983, listed among the oldest pending cases for priority hearing; nobody appeared for the petitioners or the private respondent when the list was revised, so the petition was dismissed in default with liberty to move a recall application within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 13684 of 1983
Natthoo Singh And Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
D.D.C.And Others
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : N.N. |
Srivastava .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : S.C. |
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
(Prakash Padia,J.)
March 18, 2026
Swati
Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition pending since 1983 should be dismissed in default when neither the petitioners nor the private respondent appear on the revised list.
Natthoo Singh
D.D.C.
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
