Dismissed¶13

Nazrin @ Nazreen Bano and Another v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Allahabad HC5 May 2026WRIC/17801/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nazrin @ Nazreen Bano v. State of U.P. (WRIT - C No. 17801 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J., May 6, 2026): writ of mandamus sought under Section 226 of the Constitution of India for protection of the petitioners' matrimonial life from respondent nos. 4 to 7; dismissed as infructuous after learned A.C.S.C. informed the Court that an FIR had been lodged regarding the subject matter. Search terms: mandamus; matrimonial life protection; FIR lodged; infructuous; writ - C; Allahabad High Court.

What did the court decide?

The matter has become infructuous because an FIR has been lodged with regard to the subject matter of the present case, and the petition may accordingly be dismissed as infructuous. ¶12

Nazrin @ Nazreen Bano and Another Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 17801 of 2026

¶3

Nazrin @ Nazreen Bano And Another

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. And 6 Others

¶7

		.....Resp	ondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Arvind Kumar Verma	Maurya, Om	Prakash
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶8

Court No. - 76

¶9

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

¶10

Sri O.P. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ashwani Kumar Tripathi, learned A.C.S.C. for the State.

¶11

The present petition has been filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India with the prayer to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to protect the peaceful matrimonial life, as husband and wife, of the petitioners from respondent nos.4 to 7.

¶12

Learned A.C.S.C. for the State pointed out that an FIR has been lodged with regard to the subject matter of the present case. Instructions in this regard has been received and the same is kept on record. The matter has become infructuous due to the aforesaid reason and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.

¶13

Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶14

May 6, 2026 Ishan

¶15

(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nazrin @ Nazreen Bano and Another v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nazrin @ Nazreen Bano and Another v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jabir Ali Vs State of U.P. and Another

Yashika Babbar and Another Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Deepak Alias Deepak Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt Kumari Lakshmi and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Priti Singh and Another Vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 4 Others

Tayra Khatoon and Another Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others