Disposed¶14

Mohd Salman v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC25 Mar 2026WRIC/11389/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Uttar Pradesh writ petition seeking reconnection of electricity supply disconnected on discovery of theft; petitioner Mohd Salman v. State of U.P. and 2 Others; supply company is respondent nos. 2 and 3; representation dated 5th February, 2026; instructions dated 30th March, 2026; adjournment for hearing and disposal; listed 9th April, 2026 as fresh; interim order only, no final decision, no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment granted to the petitioner for hearing and disposal of the writ petition; matter to be listed on 9th April, 2026 as fresh. No substantive relief decided at this stage. ¶14

Mohd Salman vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 11389 of 2026

¶3

Mohd Salman

¶4

	Versus	.....Peti	tioner(s)
State Of U.P. And 2 Others		.....Res	pondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Anil Ku : C.S.C., Tiwari	mar Mishra Narendra	Kumar

¶5

Court No. - 29

¶6

HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.

¶7

Mr. Narendra Kumar Tiwari, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3 (the supply company). With reference to earlier order dated 25th March, 2026, he hands up his instructions dated 30th March, 2026 with copy to Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra, learned advocate appearing for petitioner. Mr. Piyush Shukla, learned advocate, Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State.

¶8

Paragraphs 1 and 2 from aforesaid order dated 25th March, 2026 are reproduced below.

¶9

"1. Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, prayer of his client is for direction upon respondents to reconnect the electricity. To that end his client has made representation dated 5th February, 2026.

¶10

2. Mr. K.M. Mishra, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Mishra, learned advocate holding the brief appears on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3 (the supply company) and submits, disconnection was on discovery of theft. He

¶11

WRIC No. 11389 of 2026

¶12

¶13

prays for adjournment to obtain instructions."

¶14

Petitioner has adjournment for hearing and disposal of the writ petition.

¶15