Ratnesh Kumar Jaiswal and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court, WRIT - B No. 1785 of 2026, decided April 23, 2026, single judge (Arun Kumar, J.). Expedition writ petition regarding Revision No.582 of 2026 under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 dismissed as abuse of process and misconceived because it was filed on 16.4.2026 before the notice date of 21.4.2026 had expired and before notices were served. Statutory six-month disposal provisions in Para 458(2) of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual and Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 were noted. No case law was cited; no impugned order was challenged.
What did the court decide?
A writ petition for expediting a pending revision, filed before the date fixed in the notice to the opposite parties had expired and before notices had been served on them in accordance with law, amounts to an abuse of the process of the Court.