Disposed¶13

Nand Lal v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Allahabad HC22 Apr 2026WRIB/1780/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nand Lal v. State of U.P. and 7 Others, WRIT - B No. - 1780 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Arun Kumar, J., decided April 23, 2026. Direction to respondent no.2 (revisional authority) to decide stay application filed alongwith Revision No.5361 of 2025, pending since 2025, within two months of presentation of certified copy, after hearing parties. Expeditious disposal of pending stay application; no substantive adjudication on merits; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.2 to decide the pending stay application in Revision No.5361 of 2025, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within two months from presentation of certified copy of the order. ¶13

Nand Lal Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - B No. - 1780 of 2026

Nand Lal

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 7 Others

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Harish Chandra .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Azad Rai, C.S.C.

¶8

Court No. - 55

¶9

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

¶10

Heard Sri Harish Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3. Sri Azad Rai has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.8.

¶11

The present writ petition has been filed for a direction upon respondent no.2 to decide the stay application of teh petitioner filed alongwith Revision No.5361 of 2025, expeditiously, within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

¶12

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the stay application filed alongwith the revision before respondent no.2 is pending consideration since 2025, which is being unnecessarily adjourned in a routine manner.

¶13

In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the respondent no.2 to decide the pending stay application in the revision, as noticed above, by passing appropriate order, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of two months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

(Arun Kumar,J.)

April 23, 2026

Anil

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nand Lal v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nand Lal v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ahsan Ali vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Gita vs State of U.P. and 9 Others

Kunwar Bahadur Singh vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Satyapriya Tomar Vs State of U.P. and 12 Others

Mohan Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shiv Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others