Disposed¶14

Smt Naresh Devi v. State of U.P. and 8 Others

Allahabad HC23 Apr 2026WRIB/1782/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Naresh Devi v. State of U.P., WRIT - B No. 1782 of 2026, Allahabad High Court, Arun Kumar J., 23 April 2026. Direction for time-bound disposal of second appeal No.2363 of 2023 (Satyapal Singh v. Smt. Naresh Devi) within six months; suit for division of holding; maintainability application rejected 26.6.2023; first appeal dismissed 7.8.2023 by Commissioner, Meerut Division; suit proceedings stayed by Deputy District Magistrate, Tehsil Hasanpur, District Amroha vide order dated 3.10.2024; expeditious disposal; opportunity of hearing; certified copy.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.2 to decide Second Appeal No.2363 of 2023 (Satyapal Singh Vs. Smt. Naresh Devi) in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties, within six months from the date of presentation of certified copy of the order.

Smt Naresh Devi vs State of U.P. and 8 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - B No. - 1782 of 2026

Smt Naresh Devi

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 8 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Dharm Vir Jaiswal, Harsh Vikram
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Arun Kumar Pandey, C.S.C.

¶9

Court No. - 55

¶10

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.9.

¶12

The present writ petition has been filed for a direction upon respondent no.2 to decide the second appeal No.2363 of 2023 (Satyapal Singh Vs. Smt. Naresh Devi), within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

¶13

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in a suit for division of holding, an application was moved by the respondent no.3 that the suit was not maintainable. The said application was rejected by the order dated 26.6.2023. The appeal filed against the said order was also dismissed by the order dated 7.8.2023 passed by the Commissioner, Meerut Division, Meerut. Aggrieved by the aforesaid orders, the respondent no.3 has filed second appeal before the respondent no.2 in which notices have been issued and the petitioner has put in appearance. It is further contended that due to pendency of the aforesaid second appeal, the Deputy District Magistrate, Tehsil Hasanpur, District Amroha has stayed the proceedings of the suit by his order dated 3.10.2024.

¶14

In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the respondent no.2 to decide the pending second appeal, as noticed above, by passing appropriate order, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a

¶15

WRIB No. 1782 of 2026

¶16

¶17

period of six months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

(Arun Kumar,J.)

April 23, 2026

Anil