Disposed¶14

Committee of Management and Kalchuri Sanskrit Uchchattar Madhyamik Vidayalay and Another v. State of Up and 2 Others

Allahabad HC2 Apr 2026WRIA/9336/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; WRIT - A No. 9336 of 2024; Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.; decided May 5, 2026; Kalchuri Sanskrit Uchchattar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Ratsar, Ballia; recognised and aided institution; approval of appointments pending since 05.07.2011; mandamus to District Inspect of Schools, Ballia; three-month timeline for decision; writ petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 2, District Inspect of Schools, Ballia, to take a decision on approval of the selected candidates within three months from production of a certified copy of the order. ¶14

Committee of Management and Kalchuri Sanskrit Uchchattar Madhyamik Vidayalay and Another vs State of Up and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 9336 of 2024

¶3

Committee Of Management And Kalchuri Sanskrit Uchchattar Madhyamik Vidayalay And Another

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Up And 2 Others

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Gopal Ji Rai .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶8

Court No. - 32

¶9

HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

¶10

Heard Sri Gopal Ji Rai, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2.

¶11

This writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking a direction upon respondent no. 2 to take decision in regard to approval of appointments, which is pending consideration.

¶12

It is contended that petitioner is Manager of Kalchuri Sanskrit Uchattar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Ratsar, Ballia, which is a recognised and aided institution. Committee of Management had forwarded the documents for approval on 05.07.2011 and the same is pending consideration since then.

¶13

As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, respondent no. 2, District Inspect of Schools, Ballia is directed to take decision in regard to approval of selected candidates within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶14

The writ petition stands disposed of.

¶15

(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)

¶16

May 5, 2026 Kumar Manish

¶17

Digitally signed by :- MANISH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Committee of Management and Kalchuri Sanskrit Uchchattar Madhyamik Vidayalay and Another v. State of Up and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Committee of Management and Kalchuri Sanskrit Uchchattar Madhyamik Vidayalay and Another v. State of Up and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Fareed Ahmad @ Juganu vs State of U.P.

D.B.Upadhyaya Vs D.D.C. and Others

Ashok Kumar Diwvedi vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Kalawati Devi vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mohd. Owais vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Heeraman vs State of U.P. and 4 Others