Satisharan Pal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court interim order dated 04.05.2026 in Writ - A No. 5857 of 2026 (Satisharan Pal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others), Manju Rani Chauhan, J. Petitioner permitted to implead Secretary, Examination Regulatory Authority, Prayagraj as respondent no.5; State Standing Counsel (Shailendra Singh) granted two weeks to seek instructions on whether petitioner applied for correction of clerical mistake in high school marks (332 entered instead of 322); counsel Krishna Kumar Chand appeared for respondent-BSA; matter listed fresh on 19.05.2026. No final decision, no precedent discussed.
What did the court decide?
Interim directions only: (i) counsel for the petitioner permitted to implead 'Secretary, Examination Regulatory Authority, Prayagraj' as respondent no.5 during the course of the day; (ii) two weeks' time granted to Mr. Shailendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State, to obtain instructions on whether the petitioner has moved any application regarding the clerical mistake (high school marks filled as 332 instead of correct marks 322); (iii) case to be put up as fresh on 19.05.2026.